METHODOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPECIAL TEACHING: SOCIO-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DYNAMICS AND CATEGORIES

Alessia Scarinci, Guendalina Peconio, Dario Lombardi, Francesca Finestrone

Abstract


The first section of this contribution will be followed by an epistemological analysis of the dynamics, paradigms and canons that have influenced the definition and diffusion of the construct of inclusion in social and school contexts. It will deal with how neoliberal individualism and “ministerial pedagogy” have contributed to slowing down the emergence of the inclusive phenomenon, and how this has assumed a central role in the Italian social and scholastic framework only in the early nineties, owing to the spread of the model promoted in Disability Studies. The second section will deal with Disability Studies and how it has had an impact on mitigating the phenomenon of social and school segregation, promoting the diffusion of the social model and the concept of relative ability. The third section will elicit the characteristics of the inclusive approach in reference to the BES categories identified in the national and international scenario. The fourth and final section will deal with the methodological aspects and good practices useful for inclusive teaching.


Keywords


Special Needs – Studi sulla disabilità - Inclusive education - Social model

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

References


Cappuccio M.L. (2019), (edited by). Handbook of Embodied Cognition and Sport Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Aiello P., Sharma U., Di Gennaro D.C., Dimitrov, Pace D.M., Zollo E. M., & Sibilio I. M. (2017). A study on Italian teachers’ sentiments, attitudes and concerns towards inclusive education. Formazione Lavoro Persona, VII, 20, pp. 10-17.

Barnes C. (2008). Capire il" Modello Sociale della Disabilità". Intersticios. Revista sociológica de pensamiento crítico, 2(1).

Biancatelli L. (1964). Un insegnante nuovo per una scuola nuova, «Riforma della scuola», n. 1/1964, p. 29.

Bocci F. (2018). L’insegnante inclusivo e la sua formazione: una questione aperta nell’ottica dei Disability Studies. DISABILITY STUDIES, 141-171.

Booth T., & Ainscow M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE), Rm 2S203 S Block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS161QU, United Kingdom, England.

Cantatore L., & Castagno G.(2017). Gli insegnanti e la pedagogia ministeriale in Italia. Potere, ideologia e buone pratiche a scuola tra riproduzione e trasformazione sociale. 1. B. SFERRA, La storia senza frontiere. Per una didattica interculturale della storia, 2016, 2. G. LOPEZ, M. FIORUCCI (a cura di), John Dewey e la pedagogia democratica del’900, 2017. 3. F. BOCCI, M. CATARCI, M. FIORUCCI (a cura di), L’inclusione educativa. Una, 53.

Cottini L. (2014). Editoriale-Promuovere l’inclusione: l’insegnante specializzato per le attività di sostegno in primo piano. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 2(2), 10-20.

D’Alessio S. (2018). Formulare e implementare politiche e pratiche scolastiche inclusive. Riflessioni secondo la prospettiva dei Disability Studies. AA. VV., Disability studies e inclusione. Per una lettura critica delle politiche e pratiche educative, 121-140.

Deci E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.

Dyson A. (2013). Inclusion and inclusions: Theories and discourses in inclusive education. Inclusive education (pp. 36-53). Routledge.

European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education (EASNIE) (2012). Teacher education for inclusion. Profile of inclusive teachers.

Forlin C. (2012). Future directions for inclusive teacher education: An international perspective. New York: Routledge.

Franceschini G. (2018). Didattica inclusiva: aspetti metodologici, epistemologici e percorsi di ricerca. Studi sulla Formazione, 21 (2).

Friedman M. (1962), Capitalismo e libertà, Milano.

Giraldo M. (2017). Introduzione. Integrazione e/o inclusione. Mode linguistiche o differenti strategie pedagogiche, didattiche e ordinamentali? Formazione Lavoro Persona, VII, 20, pp. 6-9.

Goffman E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Goodley D., D’Alessio S., Ferri, B., Monceri F., Titchkosky T., Vadalà G., ... & Medeghini R. (2018). Disability Studies e inclusione. Per una lettura critica delle politiche e pratiche educative. Erickson, Trento.

Goussot A. (2015). La pedagogia speciale come scienza delle mediazioni e delle differenze. Aras Edizioni.

Greblo E. (2013). Capacità e diritti umani. Etica & Politica, XV, 1, pp. 563-582.

Ianes D. (2005). Bisogni educativi speciali e inclusione: valutare le reali necessità e attivare tutte le risorse. Edizioni Erickson.

Lombardo Radice L., Riforma intellettuale e morale e programmazione immediata, «Riforma della scuola», n. 3/1964, p. 11.

Medeghini R., D'Alessio S., Marra A., Vadalà G., & Valtellina E. (2013). Disability Studies. Emancipazione, inclusione scolastica e sociale, cittadinanza. Edizioni Erickson.

Milthaug D.E. (1996). Fairness, liberty and empowerment evaluation. In Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S. & Wandersman, A. (eds), Empowerment evaluation: knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

Nussbaum M.C. (1997). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham L. Rev., 66, 273.

Oliver M. (1990). Critical Texts in Social Work and the Welfare State The Politics of Disablement. Recuperado de https://disability-studies. leeds. ac. Uk/library.

Piccioli M. (2019). Il processo italiano di inclusione nella prospettiva internazionale: i Disability Studies come sviluppo inclusivo. Formazione, lavoro, persona, 20, 91-99.

Needs S.E. (2001). Code of practice. London: Department for Education and Skills., Chicago.

Semeraro A. (1993). Il mito della riforma. La parabola laica nella storia educativa della Repubblica, La Nuova Italia, Firenze p. 122.

Striano M., Capobianco R., & Cesarano V.P. (2019). La didattica inclusiva per una scuola di tutti e per tutti. Dal riconoscimento dei Bisogni Educativi Speciali alla personalizzazione degli apprendimenti. Formazione, lavoro, persona, 20, 25-36.

Travaglini A. (2020). Inclusione, normalità e disabilità: una rilettura secondo i Disability Studies. Medical Humanities & Medicina Narrativa, Rivista di pedagogia generale e sociale, 137.

UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for action on special needs education: Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education; Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7-10 June 1994. Unesco.

UNICEF. (2000). Dakar framework for action. Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. UNICEE Professor Martyn Rouse.

Wehmeyer M.L. (1995). The Arc's Self-Determination Scale: Procedural Guidelines., ISO 690, World Conference on Education for All, & Meeting Basic Learning Needs (1990). World Declaration on Education for All and Framework for Action to Meet Basic Learning Needs. Inter-Agency Commission.

Yell M.L., Shriner J.G., & Katsiyannis A. (2006). Individuals with disabilities education improvement act of 2004 and IDEA regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on exceptional children, 39(1), 1-24.

Zanazzi S. (2018). I docenti inclusivi tra teoria e pratica. Italian Journal of Educational Research, (21), 261-274.

Zaoui P. (2015). L'arte di scomparire. Vivere con discrezione. Il saggiatore.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v6i4.679

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296