Gaia Turconi, Lucia Martiniello


Distance Learning Universities (DLUs) are growing in educational offerings and student participation and can play an essential role in the digitization of learning. The analysis presented here focuses on their impact in the Italian context, and particularly in the STEM area, where innovations in teaching methods and resource management are required. ANVUR report, European Community and Ministry of Education and Merit show how the issue is pedagogical, social and economic.


Distance Learning Universities; STEM; digital education; mathematics;

Full Text:



Albano, G. (2022). Orchestrating affective, cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of undergraduate mathematics learning in digital environments. In: Hodgen J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12), ERME / Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, pp. 2323-2330, https://hal.science/hal-03750558

Ali, L., Sorrentino, C., Martiniello, L. (2023). Personalized learning in the era of digital learning and artificial intelligence: futuristic perspectives and challenges. Giornale italiano di educazione alla salute, sport e didattica inclusiva, 7 (1), https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v7i1.856

AlmaLaurea (2023). Sintesi della XXV Indagine AlmaLaurea sulla Condizione occupazionale dei Laureati. Rapporto 2023. https://www.almalaurea.it/sites/default/files/2023-07/rapportoalmalaurea2023-sintesi-occupazione.pdf

ANVUR, (2023). Rapporto sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2023.

Artigue, M. (2004). Le défi de la transition secondaire-supérieur. Que peuvent nous apporter les recherches en didactique des mathématiques?. Paper presented at the first French-Canadian Congress of Mathematical Sciences, Toulouse. https://doi.org/10.3406/dsedu.2002.1010

Bardelle, C., & Di Martino, P. (2012). E-learning in secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics: For what purpose? ZDM, 44(6), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0417-y.

Balacheff, N., & Sutherland, R. (1999). Didactical complexity of computational environments for the learning of mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 1–26.

Bhat, R.A. (2023). The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET), 2(9), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijset.v2i9.218

Chevallard, Y. (1986). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Revue française de pédagogie, 76, pp. 89-91. Grenoble.

Clark, M. & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestion for a theoretical model for secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics. Mathematics education research journal, 20(2), 25-37.

D’Amore, B., Godino, J.D. (2008). Punti di vista antropologico ed ontosemiotico. Didattica della Matematica. La matematica e la sua didattica, 1, pp. 9-38.

D’Amore, B., Sbaragli, S. (2005). Analisi semantica e didattica dell’idea di “misconcezione”. La matematica e la sua didattica, 2, pp. 139-163.

De Guzmán, M., Hodgson, B. R., Robert, A., & Villani, V. (1998). Difficulties in the passage from secondary to tertiary education. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 3, pp. 747-762. Berlin: Documenta Mathematica.

Di Martino, P., Maracci, M. (2009). The secondary-tertiary transition: beyond the purely cognitive. In: Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M., Sakonidis, C. (eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1, pp. 401-408. Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.

European Education Area. Relevant and high-quality higher education, https://education.ec.europa.eu/it/education-levels/higher-education/relevant-and-high-quality-higher-education, (ultima consultazione, marzo 2024).

EUROSTAT, (2023). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/ (ultima consultazione, marzo 2024).

Gueudet, G., Pepin, B. (2018). Didactic Contract at the Beginning of University: a Focus on Resources and their Use. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. 4, pp. 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0069-6

Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary–tertiary transition. Educational studies in mathematics, 67(3), pp. 237-254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9100-6

Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009). Introduction: the transformative nature of ‘‘dynamic’’ educational technology. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 397–398.

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., Reiss, K.M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

Iannella, A., Morando, P., Spreafico, M.L. (2022). Challenges in Mathematics Learning at the University: An Activity to Motivate Students and Promote Self-awareness. In: Casalino, G., et al. (eds.), Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2021, pp. 321-332. Cham: Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96060-5_23

INVALSI (2023). Rapporto invalsi 2023.

Martiniello, L., Sorrentino, C., Iannaccone, S., Vivona, A. (2022). Strategie di inclusione e partecipazione nella formazione universitaria. Indagine sui risultati di apprendimento raggiunti dagli studenti in Scienze motorie in periodo pandemico. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(1). Pensa Multimedia Editore, https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XX-01-22_08

Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito (2023). Linee guida per le discipline STEM, https://www.miur.gov.it/web/guest/-/nota-prot-4588-del-24-ottobre-2023, (ultima consultazione, marzo 2024).

Nicholls, J., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Patashnick, M. (1990). Assessing student’s theories of success in mathematics: individual and classroom difference. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.21.2.0109

Pepin, B. (2014). Using the Construct of the Didactic Contract to Understand Student Transition into University Mathematics Education. Policy Futures in Education, 12(5), pp. 646–657, https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.5.646

Programme for International Student Assessment PISA (2018). Results from Pisa 2018.

Presidente del Consiglio (2021). Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza, https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf, (ultima consultazione, marzo 2024).

Roffi, A. (2023). STEM e tecnologie digitali: una indagine sulle pratiche didattiche dei docenti della scuola secondaria di II grado. In: New literacies. Nuovi linguaggi, nuove competenze. Book of Abstracts, pp. 69-71. Editrice Morcelliana.

Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, pp. 627–640. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0376-8

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, pp. 20–26.

Tall D. (ed.) (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematics Education Library, Springer, Dordrecht, vol. 11.

USTAT, (2023). Portale dei Dati dell’Istruzione Superiore, Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca, https://ustat.mur.gov.it (ultima consultazione, marzo 2024).

Wold, M. (2018): Students’ usage patterns of video recorded lectures in an undergraduate mathematics course. In: INDRUM 2018, INDRUM Network, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway, https://hal.science/hal-01849929

Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Academic press, pp. 13-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v8i2.1091


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN: 2532-3296