THE DECLINATION OF THE DYNAMIC ECOLOGICAL APPROACH IN THE TEACHING AND EVALUATION OF MOTOR AND SPORTS EDUCATION INTERVENTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENTAL AGE

Benedetta Romano, Silvia Coppola, Rodolfo Vastola

Abstract


The Physical Literacy (PL) process implies a reflective theoretical focus on the characteristics of complexity, dynamism, and embodiment inherent in the interrelationship between the individual and the environment. The theory relating to the dynamic ecological approach fits fully into this meaning, emphasizing the synergies between the individual and the environment and the role of emerging constraints. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a didactic intervention, based on these principles, on the physical performance of a sample of 9 children aged between 4 and 8 years (average 6.22 ±1.79). The trial lasted six months, with two weekly meetings lasting 75 minutes each. The results show statistically significant differences between pre and post-intervention in the reference sample, consistent with the results of other studies in the scientific literature. In conclusion, in the light of the theoretical framework of reference and the results obtained in this study and in other researches, the importance of planning motor activities and experiences that follow the principles of individual-environment mutuality emerges, where the environment represents a primary factor in determining motor behavior.

Keywords


Motor Sciences; Didactic; Pedagogy; Education

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

References


Barbado Murillo, D.; Caballero Sánchez, C.; Moreside, J.; Vera-García, F. J. & Moreno, F. J. (2017). Can the structure of motor variability predict learning rate? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 596–607

Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulations of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Caballero Sánchez, C.; Barbado Murillo, D.; Davids, K. & Moreno Hernández, F. J. (2016). Variations in task constraints shape emergent performance outcomes and complexity levels in balancing. Experimental brain research, 234, 1611-1622.

Caballero, C.; Davids, K.; Heller, B.; Wheat, J. & Moreno, F. J. (2019). Movement variability emerges in gait as adaptation to task constraints in dynamic environments. Gait & posture, 70, 1-5.

Cools, W.; De Martelaer, K.; Vandaele, B.; Samaey, C. & Andries, C. (2010). Assessment of movement skill performance in preschool children: Convergent validity between MOT 4-6 and M-ABC. Journal of sports science & medicine, 9(4), 597.

Coppola, S., Romano, B., Albano, D., & Vastola, R. (2021). Training in young athletes: Ecological dynamics approach. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(4proc), S1563-S1577

Coppola, S., & Papa, S. (2015). L'attività motoria in età evolutiva: analisi dei benefici e strumenti di valutazione. Lecce. Pensa Editore.

D'Anna, C.; Albano, D.; Romano, B. & Vastola, R. (2021a). Physical Education Between Neuroscience and Complexity: The Systemic Perspective Applied to Inclusive Didactics. Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics, 5(2).

D'Anna, C., Romano, B., & Vastola, R. (2021b). Planning Learning Environments Rich of Affordance to Lead the Learners in the Successfull Performance of a Motor Task: A Preliminary Study. Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics, 5(3).

Davids, K., Rothwell, M. & Rudd, J. (2023). Enriching lives across the lifescourse: adopting an ecological perspective to foster the person-environment relationship throughout development. Universidade do Algarve-Escola Superior de Educação e Comunicação, 21-28.

Davids, K.; Araújo, D. & Brymer, E. (2016). Designing affordances for health-enhancing physical activity and exercise in sedentary individuals. Sports Med. 46, 933–938.

Davids, K.; Button, C. & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics.

Davids, K.; Glazier, P.; Araújo, D. & Bartlett, R. (2003). Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports medicine, 33, 245-260.

Giblin, S.; Collins, D. & Button, C. (2014). Physical literacy: importance, assessment and future directions. Sports Medicine, 44, 1177-1184.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.

Gray, R. (2021). How We Learn to Move: A Revolution in the Way We Coach & Practice Sports Skills. Independently published.

Hristovski, R.; Davids, K.; Araujo, D. & Passos, P. (2011). Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in complex neurobiological systems: a basis for creativity in sport. Nonlinear Dynamics-Psychology and Life Sciences, 15(2), 175..

IPLA [International Physical Literacy Association] (2017). IPLA definition. https://www.physicalliteracy. org.uk/.

Krakauer, J. W. & Mazzoni, P. (2011). Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Current opinion in neurobiology, 21(4), 636-644.

Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the Development of Coordination. In Motor Skill Acquisition in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control. Edited by Michael G. Wade, and Harry T. A. Whiting, 341–360. Boston, MA: M. Nihjoff.

Orth, D.; Van der Kamp., J.; Memmert, D. & Se Savelsbergh, G. (2017). Creative motor actions as emerging from movement variability. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 1903.

Otte, F. W., Davids, K., Millar, S. K., & Klatt, S. (2021). Understanding how athletes learn: Integrating skill training concepts, theory and practice from an ecological perspective. Applied Coaching Research Journal, 7, 22-32.

Otte, F.W.; Rothwell, M.; Woods C. & Davids, K. (2020). Specialist role coaching integrated into a Department of Methodology in Team Sports Organisations. Sports Medicine- Open, 6: 55

Pesce, C.; Marchetti, R.; Motta, A. & Bellucci M. (2015). Joy of Moving. MoviMenti & ImmaginAzione. Giocare con la variabilità per promuovere lo sviluppo motorio, cognitive e del cittadino. Calzetti Mariucci Editori.

Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 146-155.

Pol, R.; Balagué, N.; Ric, A.; Torrents, C.; Kiely, J.; & Hristovski, R. (2020). Training or synergizing? Complex systems principles change the understanding of sport processes. Sports Medicine-Open, 6(1), 1-13

Renshaw, I. & Chow, J. Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103-116.

Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Davids, K. (2019). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: Embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162-175.

Robinson, L. E.; Stodden, D. F.; Barnett, L. M.; Lopes, V. P.; Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P. & D’Hondt, E. (2015). Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports medicine, 45, 1273-1284.

Romano B.; Albano D. & Coppola S. (2022). The manipulation of constraints to train the complexity of soccer: the small sided conditioned games. Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics. ISBN 978-88-6022-438-5

Rudd, J. R.; Pesce, C.; Strafford, B. W. & Davids, K. (2020). Physical literacy-A journey of individual enrichment: An ecological dynamics rationale for enhancing performance and physical activity in all. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1904.

Rudd, J.; Renshaw, I.; Savelsbergh, G.J.P.; Chow, J.Y.; Roberts, W.; Newcombe, D. & Davids, K. (2021). Nonlinear Pedagogy and The Athletics Skills Model. The Importance ff Play in Supporting Physical Literacy. Routledge. New York.

Savelsbergh, G. J. & Wormhoudt, R. (2018). Creating adaptive athletes: the athletic skills model for enhancing physical literacy as a foundation for expertise. Movement & Sport Sciences-Science & Motricité, (102), 31-38.

Schoemaker, M. M.; Niemeijer, A. S.; Flapper, B. C. & Smits‐Engelsman, B. C. (2012). Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery for children‐2 checklist for children with and without motor impairments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54(4), 368-375.

Seifert, L.; Papet, V.; Strafford, B. W.; Gogliani, A. & Davids, K. (2018). Skill transfer, expertise and talent development: An ecological dynamics perspective. Movement Sport Sciences, 4, 39-49.

Shearer, C.; Goss, H. R.; Edwards, L. C.; Keegan, R. J.; Knowles, Z. R.; Boddy, L. M.; Durden-Myers, E. J. & Foweather, L. (2018). How Is Physical Literacy Defined? A Contemporary Update. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 237-245.

Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: throughout the lifecourse. London: Routledge.

Whitehead, M. (Ed.). (2019). Physical literacy across the world. London: Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v7i2.848

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296