HOW TO MANAGE THE CLASSROOM TO HELP LEARNING: BUILDING EVIDENCE ON TEACHING PRACTICES TO THINK ABOUT IMPROVEMENT

Daniela Maccario

Abstract


In order to contribute to the construction of useful knowledge for improvement in the management of classroom teaching processes, the research set out to construct 'evidence on practices' from the perspective of their processual intelligibility. Through an internal observational approach, recurring and widespread issues in task management and student engagement were recognised; in relation to them, professional gestures typically focused on the use of language, restraint and sanctions were observed and attempts were made to capture recurring elements in the dynamics between teacher and student behaviour. In the face of the need for a deeper scientific understanding of didactic facts in contexts (Chevallard, 2014), the study recalls the importance of frameworks, constructs and tools aimed at advancing theory-practice dialogue.


Keywords


Didattica

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altet M. (2019). Conjuguer des recherches sur les pratiques enseignantes et sur la formation des enseignants: une double fonctionscientifique et sociale des sciences de l’education. Les Sciences de l’éducation- Pour l’Ère nouvelle (52)2: 29-60.

Artigue M. (2002). Ingénierie didactique: quel rôle dans la recherche didactique aujourd’hui? Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 8: 9-52.

Brown A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classrooms settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 141-178.

Bryk, A. (2015). Accelerating the way we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44 (9): 467-477.

Bryk A., Gomez L., Grunow A., Le Mahieu P. (2015). Learning to Improve.

How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting. Harvard: Harvard Education Pr.

Bru, M. (2019). De quelques reconfigurations du rapport des recherches aux pratiques enseignantes. Les sciences de l'Éducation - Pour l'Ère Nouvelle, 1(52): 79-101.

Bru, M. (2021). Les méthodes en pédagogie. Parigi: PUF.

Bucheton, D. (2019). Les gestes professionnels dans la classe: Ethiques et pratiques pour les temps qui viennent. Parigi: PUF.

Bucheton D., Soulé Y. (2009). Les gestes professionnels et le jeu des postures de l’enseignant dans la classe: un multi-agenda de préoccupations enchâsses. Éducation & Didactique, 3-3: 29-48.

Calvani, A. (2022). La ricerca didattica può diventare rilevante per la pratica? Se sì, in che modo? ECPS Journal, 26: 143-162.

Calvani A., De Angelis M., Marzano A., Vegliante R. (2022). Lo stato della ricerca didattica in Italia. Una Scoping Review. Giornale Italiano della ricerca educativa, 29: 34-48.

Calvani A., Trinchero R., Vivanet G. (2018). Nuovi orizzonti della ricerca scientifica in educazione. Raccordare ricerca e decisione didattica: il manifesto SApIE. ECPS- Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies, 18: 311-339.

Calvani A., Trinchero R. (2019). Dieci falsi miti e dieci regole per insegnare bene. Roma: Carocci.

Cèbe S., Goigoux R. (2017). Narramus. Apprendre à comprendre et à raconter. Paris: Retz.

Calvani A., Marzano A. (2020). Progettare per un miglioramento basato su evidenze. Quale metodologia? Giornale Italiano della ricerca educativa, XIII(24): 67-83.

Chevallard, Y. (2014). Des didactiques des disciplines scolaires à la didactique comme science anthropologique. Education & Didactique, 1, 8: 35-43.

Collins A. (1993). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon, T.O. Shea (eds), New directions in educational technology (pp.15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Damiano, E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell'insegnamento. Milano: Franco Angeli.

DBR Collective (2003). Design-Based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1): 5-8.

Easterday M.W., Rees Lewis D.G., Gerber E.M. (2018). The logic of design research. Learning: Research and Practice,4(2): 131-160.

Elliot J., Giordan A., Scurati C. (1993). La Ricerca-Azione. Metodiche, strumenti e casi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

Fabre, M. (2017). Quest-ce que problématiser? Parigi: Vrin.

Hattie J. (2016). Apprendimento visibile, insegnamento efficace. Trento: Erickson.

Hattie J., Zierer K. (2018). 10 Mindframes for Visible Learning. Teaching for success. New York: Routledge.

Laneve C. (2023). Il sapere didattico. Roma: Armando.

Lenoir, Y. (2017). Les médiations au cœur des pratiques d'enseignement-apprentissage. Sherbrooke: Cursus Universitaire.

Lorin Anderson W. (2004). Increasing Teacher Effectiveness. Unesco- International Institute for Educational Planning.

Maccario, D. (2012). Come studiare le pratiche didattiche? Unità di analisi e funzioni della teoria. In S. Polenghi, F.Cereda, P. Zini, La responsabilità della Pedagogia nelle trasformazioni dei rapporti sociali. Storia, linee di ricerca e prospettive. Lecce: Penda Multimedia, pp. 135-142.

Magnoler, P. (2012). Ricerca e formazione. La professionalizzazione degli insegnanti. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.

Menichetti L., Pellegrini M., Gola C. (2019). Cornici mentali e stereotipie didattiche nella formazione degli insegnanti. Formazione&Insegnamento XXII (1): 351-374.

Pastré P. (2011). La didattica professionale. Parigi: PUF.

Pentucci M. (2018). I formati pedagogici nelle pratiche degli insegnanti. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Pellerey M. (1980). Il metodo della Ricerca-Azione di K. Lewin nei suoi più recenti sviluppi e applicazioni. Orientamenti Pedagogici, 27(3): 449-463.

Pellerey M. (2005). Verso una nuova metodologia di ricerca educativa. La Ricerca basata su Progetti. Orientamenti Pedagogici, 52(5): 721-737.

Philippakos Z.A. et alii (2021). Design-Based Research in Education. Theory and Applications. New York-London. Guilford Press.

Puortois J.P. (1984). La Ricerca-Azione in Pedagogia. In E. Becchi, B. Vertecchi (ed.). Manuale critico della sperimentazione e della ricerca educativa (pp. 134-155). Milano: Franco Angeli.

Rey, B. (2014). La notion de compétence en éducation et formation. Enjeux et problèmes. Enjeux et problèmes. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Rosenshine B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 88(5): 262-268.

Scurati C., Zanniello G. (1993). La ricerca azione. Contributi per lo sviluppo educativo. Napoli: Tecnodid.

Tarozzi, M. (2021). Le evidenze complesse nella ricerca educativa. In S. Polenghi, F. Cereda, P. Zini (a cura di). Le responsabilità della pedagogia nella trasformazione dei rapporti sociali (pp.111-118). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.

Vander Der Maren J.-M. (2014). La recherche appliquée pour les professionnels - Education, (para)médical, travail social. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Vergnaud G. (2011). Au fond de l’action, la conceptualisation. In J.-M. Barbier (ed.), Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action (pp. 275-292). Paris: PUF.

Veyrunes, P. (2017). La classe: hier, aujourd'hui et demain? Touolouse: Presses Universitaires du Midi.

Vinatier, I. & Altet, M. (2008). Analyser et comprendre la pratique enseignante. Rennes: PUR.

Zanniello G. (2023). Educational practices, evidence-based experimentation and R-A whith project. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 16 (30), 11-22.

Zanniello G., De Vita (2021). La ricerca didattica in Italia (1950-2020). Roma: Armando.

Zheng L. (2015). A systematic literature review on design-based research from 2004 to 2013. J.Comput. Educ, 2 (4): 399-420.

Wenger E. (1998). Communities of Practices, Leaning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v9i2_Sup.1553

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296