COMPARING UDL AND TRADITIONAL E-LEARNING COURSES: LEVERAGING EDUCATIONAL DATA MINING TO ENHANCE SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND MOTIVATION

Emanuele Marsico, Muhammad Amin Nadim, Luigi Piceci

Abstract


This work is presented as a position paper aimed at introducing an analytical framework accompanied by a project proposal comparing two university courses: one implemented according to the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and the other using a traditional approach, utilizing Educational Data Mining (EDM) to analyze data indicative of learning processes. The objective is to assess how the UDL approach influences Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) processes and student motivation. The project aims to structure a computational theoretical framework encompassing variables such as engagement, perceived self-efficacy, and academic outcomes, to identify the advantages of UDL implementation in enhancing self-regulation and learning motivation. This approach allows for evaluating the effectiveness of the two educational strategies, providing concrete data to optimize the learning experience and improve academic results. 


Keywords


Universal Design for Learning, Self-Regulated Learning, Learning Motivation, Educational Data Mining, Self-Efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). The Effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Application on E-learning Acceptance: A Structural Equation Model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 54-87. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2880

Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069

Bendjebar, S., Lafifi, Y., & Seridi-Bouchelaghem, H. (2022). An Improvement of a Data Mining Technique for Early Detection of At-Risk Learners in Distance Learning Environments. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 15(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2022.121958

Bisri, A., Supardi, Y., Heryatun, H., & Naviras, A. (2025). Educational data mining model using support vector machine for student academic performance evaluation. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 478-486. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21609

Boulahmel, A., Djelil, F., & Smits, G. (2025). Investigating Self-Regulated Learning Measurement Based on Trace Data: A Systematic Literature Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09816-y

CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield

Chen, X., Xie, H., Qin, S. J., Wang, F. L., & Hou, Y. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Supported Student Engagement Research: Text Mining and Systematic Analysis. European Journal of Education, 60(1), 1-18.

Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2015). Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom: Practical Applications. New York: Guilford Press.

Heikkinen, S., et al. (2023). Learning Analytics for Self-Regulated Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(1), 45-68.

Kumar, V., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by Design: Applying UDL Principles in a First Year Undergraduate Course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125-147.

Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Rose, D. H., & Gravel, J. W. (2010). Universal Design for Learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 167-172). Academic Press.

Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Gutiérrez-González, S., Rodríguez, Á., Alameda Cuenca-Romero, L., Calderón, V., & Queiruga-Dios, M. Á. (2020). Systematic Review on Inclusive Education, Sustainability in Engineering: An Analysis with Mixed Methods and Data Mining Techniques. Sustainability, 12(18), 6861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12186861

Saint, J., et al. (2022). Self-Regulated Learning in Digital Environments: A Comprehensive Review. Computers & Education, 180, 104445.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Routledge.

Viberg, O., et al. (2020). The Role of Learning Analytics in Supporting Student Agency in Higher Education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(3), 1-14.

Widodo, A. (2023). Implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Concepts on Learning in Higher Education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(6), 1-15.

Wilken, K. A., & Adamiak, J. (2025). Educational Data Mining in Open Distance e-Learning: A Pragmatic Approach to Module-level Analytics. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.25159/UnisaRxiv/000030.v2

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as Self-Regulated Learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 277-304).

Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zhou, C., & Hou, F. (2024). Can AI Empower L2 Education? Exploring Its Influence on the Behavioural, Cognitive and Emotional Engagement of EFL Teachers and Language Learners. European Journal of Education, 59, e12750.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: Which Are the Key Subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307-313.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v9i2.1506

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296