BEYOND THE TECHNOSUPERCRIP: NEURO-BODY-DIVERGENCE AS A POLITICAL SPACE IN THE CRIPBORG PARADIGM
Abstract
Keywords
References
Berger, R. J. (2008). Disability and the dedicated wheelchair athlete: Beyond the “supercrip” critique. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(6), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607309893
Bocci, F., & Straniero, A. M. (2020). Altri corpi. Visioni e analisi delle rappresentazioni della (e incursioni sulla) disabilità e diversità (Vol. 10). Roma TrE-Press. https://doi.org/10.13134/979-12-80060-65-5
Brittain, I. (2016). The Paralympic Games explained (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Clynes, M. E., & Kline, N. S. (1960). Cyborgs and space. Astronautics, 5(9), 26–27, 74–76.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Hardin, M., & Hardin, B. (2004). The “supercrip” in sport media: Wheelchair athletes discuss hegemony’s disabled hero. Sociology of Sport Online, 7(1).
Howe, P. D. (2008). The cultural politics of the Paralympic movement: Through an anthropological lens. Routledge.
Howe, P. D. (2011). Cyborg and supercrip: The Paralympics technology and the (dis)empowerment of disabled athletes. Sociology, 45(5), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413421
Howe, P. D., & Silva, C. F. (2017). The cyborgification of Paralympic sport. Movement & Sport Sciences – Science & Motricité, 97(3), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2017013
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
Mayring, P. (2021). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide.
Milani Comparetti, A. (1980). La riabilitazione riabilitata. Salute e territorio, 10, 22-24.
Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press.
Monceri, F. (2017). Oltre l’identità stabilita: Considerazioni su sessualità, disabilità e invecchiamento. Edizioni ETS.
Monceri, F. (A cura di). (2009). Sull’orlo del futuro: Ripensare il post-umano. Edizioni ETS.
Montalti, C. (2021). Tecnologie assistive, disabilità e dinamiche di potere: Per una critica del modello emancipatorio. Rivista Internazionale di Studi Critici sulla Disabilità, 1(2), 45–62.
Montalti, C. (2025). Prospettive cyborg sulla disabilità: Tecnologie, relazioni di cura e futuri culturali. DeriveApprodi.
Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348
Piccioli, M. (2020). Relational Model e Cultural Model come incontro tra integrazione e inclusione. Un’occasione di sviluppo per la scuola italiana. Edizioni ETS.
Purdue, D. E., & Howe, P. D. (2012). See the sport, not the disability: Exploring the Paralympic paradox. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 4(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2012.685102
Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge. (Trad. it. Disabilità e società. Diritti, falsi miti, percezioni sociali, Erickson, Trento, 2017).
Silva, C. F., & Howe, P. D. (2012). The (in)validity of supercrip representation of Paralympian athletes. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 36(2), 174–194.
Wolbring, G. (2024). From supercrip to techno-supercrip. Current Issues in Sport Science, 9(1), 004. https://doi.org/10.36950/2023.3ciss007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v10i3.1826
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
Publisher: Cares srl – REN Press (since 2026). Previously published by Gaia srl – Edizioni Universitarie Romane (2017–2025).
ISSN: 2532-3296 E-ISSN: 3103-5744
Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
