Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
THE ALGORITHM CANNOT CARE, BUT IT CAN SUPPORT CARE: RETHINKING AFFECTIVE EDUCATION IN AI-MEDIATED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
Abstract
This theoretical contribution examines the boundary between authentic educational care and its algorithmic simulation in AI-mediated learning environments. Drawing on Noddings’ (1984, 2005) ethics of care and recent critiques of AI-simulated empathy in educational settings (Ortega-Ochoa et al., 2023), it argues that AI cannot replicate the embodied, ethical dimensions of genuine educational relationships. Nevertheless, AI can meaningfully support care processes—particularly in inclusive contexts (Barajas Motta et al., 2025)—when educators develop adequate competencies to navigate affective human-machine interaction (Shan et al., 2025). The concept of Digital Affective Literacy is proposed as a foundational teacher competency (UNESCO, 2024), enabling a critical distinction between simulated responsiveness and genuine relational engagement, and repositioning the educator as the irreplaceable caring presence in AI-mediated environments.
Keywords
References
Barajas Motta, N., Chiappe, A., & Sáez Delgado, F. M. (2025). Bridging the gap: AI and teacher training for inclusive Education 4.0. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70033
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Ciampa, K., Wolfe, Z. M., & Bronstein, B. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Transforming digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1310
D'Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.005
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Fukukawa, K., & Trivedi, R. H. (2025). Empathy, ethics and efficacy: The 3Es of implementing artificial intelligence for consumer encounters. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22235
Garcia-Garcia, J. M., Penichet, V. M., Lozano, M. D., Garrido, J. E., Law, E. L., & Carta, S. (2018). Multimodal affective computing to enhance the user experience of educational software applications. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8751426
Glaskin, K. (2012). Empathy and the robot: A neuroanthropological analysis. Annals of Anthropological Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-9588.2012.01093.x
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
Hemachandran, K., Rasmussen, K. B., Rajest, S. S., Singh, J., & González-Argote, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence: A universal virtual tool to augment tutoring in higher education. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1410448
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Jafari, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and learning environment: Human considerations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13011
Jones, R. H. (2022). Commentary: Critical digital literacies as action, affinity, and affect. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3153
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mikeladze, T., Meijer, P. C., & Verhoeff, R. P. (2024). A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence competence frameworks for educators: A critical review. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12663
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. Teachers College Press.
Omri, A., Slimani, S., & Afi, H. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence and digital solutions in transforming educational and employment access for individuals with disabilities. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13225
Ortega-Ochoa, E., Arguedas, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2023). Empathic pedagogical conversational agents: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13413
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100011
Pepito, J. A., Ito, H., Betriana, F., Tanioka, T., & Locsin, R. C. (2020). Intelligent humanoid robots expressing artificial humanlike empathy in nursing situations. Nursing Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12318
Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. MIT Press.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Shan, Q., Xu, Y., Yusoff, Y. b., & Mutalib, A. b. (2025). EFL university students’ emotional engagement in AI-mediated learning contexts: A sentiment analysis. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4193
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
Velasquez, A., West, R., Graham, C., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Developing caring relationships in schools: A review of the research on caring and nurturing pedagogies. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3014
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xie, X., Zhang, L. J., & Xu, X. (2026). ‘Don’t give up the power to think!’: A case study of English language teachers’ AI ethics and AI-induced emotions. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70456
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v10i3.1715
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
Publisher: Cares srl – REN Press (since 2026). Previously published by Gaia srl – Edizioni Universitarie Romane (2017–2025).
ISSN: 2532-3296 E-ISSN: 3103-5744