Caterina Bembich, Andrea Gaspardo


The socio-constructivist approach is the mainstream theoretical framework orientating the institutional mandate of most education and training organizations. Many aspects of analysis, design, intervention, and evaluation currently refer to the ecological model, the construction of meanings and intersubjectivity. According to a socio-constructivist perspective, emotions represent an aspect strictly connected to the social life of individuals and are the result of a complex process that involves biological, psychological, behavioural, and socio-cultural factors. Understanding emotional processes should therefore focus on the relationship between emotion and culture, considering how cultural factors and social experience can influence the way emotions are expressed, encoded, and interpreted. However, in educational contexts, the social dimension of emotions is often framed within a precise framework of meanings and interpreted using rigidly applied emotion categorization schemes. Starting from these premises, the present work aims to investigate through an exploratory survey, the process of emotional signification from a socio-cultural perspective. The results show reveal that the semantic field of emotions is highly heterogeneous, and that there is a considerable subjective and cultural component in their process of signification. Finally, it highlights the critical need to deconstruct the concept of emotional categorization in educational practices.

Parole chiave

Emotions, Cognition, Education, Socio-Constructivism, Processes of signification

Full Text


Riferimenti bibliografici

Averill, J. R. (1980). A constructivist View of Emotion, in Plutchik, R., Kellerman, H. (a cura di). Theories of Emotion, vol. 1, New York: Academic Press, pp. 305-340.

Averill, J. R. (2017). The Social Construction of Emotion: Myths and Realities, testo disponibile alla pagina: [sito consultato in data 9 maggio 2022].

Bruni, L. (2021). Costruite poiché scoperte insieme. Sul carattere sociale delle emozioni. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 12(24), 7-11.

Cagol M. (2019). Emozioni e pedagogia. Per un primo inquadramento scientifico. Studi sulla Formazione: 22, 111-121 2019-2 DOI: 10.13128/ssf-10790 | ISSN 2036-6981 (online).

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Gosset/Putnam Press, New York, NY (trad it. di F. Macaluso. L'errore di Cartesio. Emozione, ragione e cervello umano, Adelphi, Milano, 1995).

De Giorgio, F. (2020). Nel nome dell'animalità di cavalli, cani, umani e altri animali, L'Età dell'Acquario, Torino.

De Marco, I. e Raviolo, A. (2012). Le emozioni in psicologia cognitiva. In Rezzonico, G. e De Marco, I. (a cura di). Lavorare con le emozioni nell'approccio costruttivista, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2012.

Devoto G., Oli G.C. (1990). Il dizionario della lingua italiana. Felice Le Monnier, Firenze.

Dixon, T. (2003). From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category, Cambridge University Press.

Fehr, B. e Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of Emotion Viewed from a Prototype Perspective, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113, pp. 464-86.

Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogia do oprimido. Edições Afrontamento (trad. it. La pedagogia degli oppressi, Mondadori, Milano, 1971).

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions, Cambridge University Press, London.

Grušovnik, T., Spannring, R., Syse, K. L. (a cura di) (2021) Environmental and animal abuse denial: averting our gaze, Lexington Books, London.

Hahn, R.A., Kleinman, A. (1983). Biomedical practice and anthropological theory. Annual review of anthropology, 305-333.

Harré R. (1986). The social constructionism of emotions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 19, pp. 188-205.

Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109, 219_259.

Lakoff, G., Kövecses, Z. (1986). The conceptualization of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leventhal, H. e Scherer, K. (1987). The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: a Functional Approach to a Semantic Controversy, Cognition and Emotion, 1, 1, pp. 3-28.

Lutz, C., & White, G. M. (1986). The anthropology of emotions. Annual review of anthropology, 405-436.

Lutz, C. 1 987. Emotion and Culture: Emotion and Everyday Life on a Micronesian Atoll. Unpublished manuscript

Nanni, C. (2009). Antropologia pedagogica. Prove di scritture per l’oggi. Roma: LAS.

Neumann, R. (2000). The causal influences of attributions on emotions: A procedural priming approach. Psychological Science, 11, 179_182.

Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions. American Scientist, 89(4).

Rezzonico, G. e De Marco, I. (a cura di) (2012). Lavorare con le emozioni nell'approccio costruttivista, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

Robert, S. F., Amoretti, G., Ciceri, M. R. (2008). Psicologia Generale, Mc Graw Hill, Milano.

Russell, J. A. (2009) Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction, Cognition and emotion, 23:7, 1259-1283, DOI: 10.1080/02699930902809375, testo disponibile alla pagina: [sito consultato in data 15/05/2022].

Spannring, R., De Giorgio-Schoorl, J. (2021). The Horse in the Room, The Denial of Animal Subjectivity and Agency in Social Science Research on Human–Horse Relationships. In Grušovnik, T., Spannring, R., Syse, K. L. (edited by). Environmental and animal abuse denial: averting our gaze, Lexington Books, London, 2021, pp. 187-200.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548_573.

Young, P. T. (1943). Emotions in man and animals: its nature and relation to attitude and motive. Wiley. New York.



  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.

Copyright (c) 2023 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.