INCLUSION AND REPRODUCTION. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HABITUS AND PERCEIVED MASTERY OF STRATEGIC COMPETENCES

Andrea Giacomantonio, Lucia Martiniello

Abstract


The hypothesis informing this study was that students’ habitus, via their scholastic disposition, is associated with their self-perceived mastery of strategic skills. We set out to test this hypothesis by conducting multiple correspondence analysis followed by cluster analysis on a dataset collected from a convenience sample of 1,012 first-year students attending seven upper secondary schools. Through the Su Misura (Made to measure) service provided by the Anicia publishing house, the subjects completed a reading comprehension test, a math test, Michele Pellerey’s Learning Strategy Questionnaire, and a short student questionnaire. Five groups were identified via the statistical analyses. Examination of the properties of the different groups seems to show that the group with the poorest school disposition were disoriented but relatively capable of managing volition and anxiety. They also obtained low scores in the reading and math tests. The group with the best scholastic disposition achieved the highest scores on the two tests and scored higher in volition and tendency to attribute success to controllable causes than the mean of the validation sample. These results appear to confirm that there is a relationship between scholastic disposition and strategic skills, but one of moderate strength. This outcome can inform inclusion dispositives by prompting, for example, the activation of policies designed to engage and support families.


Keywords


Inclusion at School, Scholastic Disposition, Strategic Competences, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Cluster Analysis

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

References


Amaturo, E. (1989). Analyse des donnés e analisi dei dati nelle scienze sociali. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore.

Barbaranelli, C. (2003). Analisi dei dati. Tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologia e sociale. Milano: LED.

Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Analisi dei dati con SPSS. II. Le analisi multivariate. Milano: LED.

Bonazza V. (2021). Individualizzazione e scuola. Il modello di apprendimento, la strategia didattica, la ricerca empirica. Milano: Franco Angeli

Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C. (1970). La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Les Éditions De Minuit.

Bourdieu, P. (1972). La trasmissione dell’eredità culturale. In M. Barbagli (Ed.), Istruzione, legittimazione e conflitto (pp. 284-313). Bologna: il Mulino.

Bourdieu P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Bourdieu, P., (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development. Theory and applications (4th ed.). Los Angeles (CA): Sage.

Di Franco, G. (2001). EDS: Esplorare, descrivere e sintetizzare i dati. Guida pratica all'analisi dei dati nella ricerca sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli .

Di Franco, G. (2006). Corrispondenze multiple e altre tecniche multivariate per variabili categoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Heckman J.J., Kautz T., Humphries J.E. (2014). The Myth of Achievement Tests: The GED and the Role of Character in American life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Anherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Foucault, M. (1990). Qu'est-ce que la critique? Critique et Aufklärung, Bullettin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 84(2), 35-63.

Giacomantonio, A. (2020). Competenze strategiche e learning outcomes. In M. Pellerey, M. Margottini, E. Ottone (Eds.), Dirigere se stessi nello studio e nel lavoro. Competenzestrategiche.it. Strumenti e applicazioni (pp. 163-172). Roma: Roma TrePress.

Giacomantonio, A. (2022). On the process of legitimizing the concept of competence. Genealogical hypotheses. In V. Bonazza, Assessment, evaluation, and school. Ideology, common sense, and research culture (pp. 59-79). Paris: L’Harmattan.

Giacomantonio, A., Piancastelli, L. (2015). Su misura. Un servizio per valutare, progettare, migliorare, Q-Times, VII(3), 112-127.

Mitchell, D. (2014). What Really Works in Special and Inclusive. Education Using evidence-based teaching strategies (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.

OECD, (2021). Beyond Academic Learning: First Results from the Survey of Social and Emotional Skills. Paris: OECD.

Pavone, M. (2014). L’inclusione educativa. Indicazioni pedagogiche per la disabilità. Milano: Mondadori.

Pellerey, M. (1996). Questionario sulle strategie di apprendimento (QSA). Roma: LAS.

Pellerey, M. (2006). Dirigere il proprio apprendimento. Autodeterminazione e autoregolazione nei processi di apprendimento. Brescia: La Scuola.

Pellerey, M. (2017). Soft skill e orientamento professionale. Roma: CnoS-FAP.

Pellerey, M., Grządziel, D. (2013). Il quadro di riferimento teorico e gli strumenti valutativi ed auto-valutativi valorizzati e un approfondimento del concetto di competenza strategica come abiti o disposizioni operative stabili della persona. In M. Pellerey, D. Grządziel, M. Margottini, E. Epifani, E. Ottone, Imparare a dirigere se stessi. Progettazione e realizzazione di una guida e di uno strumento informatico per favorire l’autovalutazione e lo sviluppo delle proprie competenze strategiche nello studio e nel lavoro (pp. 9-53). Roma: CnoS-FAP.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v6i2.656

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN: 2532-3296