LATENT EPISTEMOLOGIES AND INCLUSION: ABOUT THE DIFFICULTY OF ANA-LYZING IMPLICIT ASSUMPTIONS

Fabrizio Schiavo, Diletta Chiusaroli

Abstract


Personal epistemology represents an area of philosophy that deals with the nature of human knowledge and that turns its attention to investigating the personal beliefs and conceptions that individuals have about it and the way of knowing. These individual beliefs guide the way of understanding the world, solving problems and implementing learning processes. Starting from the constructs of personal epistemology and of epistemological belief, in recent years an important area of research has arisen in the international scientific literature, which investigated how personal epistemological perspectives are correlated and how these have implications for teaching. According to scientific literature, teachers today should learn to give space, in addition to the presentation of knowledge, also to problems and considerations of  epistemic nature, regarding the ways in which such knowledge is acquired. The interest is often limited only to the content of knowledge rather than the process of their acquisition.

Promoting the development in our students of a sort of epistemic sensitivity, a mental habit that can then be activated even outside of school, represents an important condition for the development of various skills related to cognitive autonomy and the habit of critically evaluating the information received.


Parole chiave


Epistemological Beliefs, Inclusion, Latent Epistemologies

Full Text

PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici


Anning, A. (1988). Teachers theories about childrens learning. In J. Calderhead (a cura di) Teachers Pro-fessional Learning, pp.128-144, London: Farmer Press.

Borko, H., & Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D.C. Berliner, R.C. Calfee (a cura di) Handbook of Educational Psycology p.673-708, New York: MacMillan.

Brousseau, G. (2006). Epistemologia e formazione degli insegnanti. In: Sbaragli S. (ed) (2006). La mate-matica e la sua didattica, venti anni di impegno. Atti del convegno internazionale omonimo. Castel San pietro Terme, 23 settembre 2006.

Brown, D.F., & Rose, T.D. (1995). Self-reported classroom impact of teachers theories about learning and obstacles to implementation. Action in Teacher Education, 17: 20-29.

Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and Knowledge. In D.C. Berliner e R.C. Calfee (a cura di) Hand-book of Educational Psychology, p.709-725, New York: MacMillan.

D’Amore, B., Fandiño Pinilla, M.I., Marazzani, I., Santi, G., & Sbaragli S. (2009). Il ruolo dell’epistemologia dell’insegnante nelle pratiche d’insegnamento. L’insegnamento della matematica e delle scienze integrate. 32B, 2, 171-192.

Dweck, C., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children's theories of intelligence: Consequences for learning. In Paris, S. G., Olson, G. M., Stevenson, H. W. (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Elliot, A. J., & Mc Gregor, H. A. (2001). Achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, pp.501-519.

Eraut, M. (1994). Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Falmer Press.

Hofer, B. K & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.

Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and instruction. Educa-tional Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-382.

Hofer, B. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129-163.

Hoy, A. W., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P.A. Alexander e P. H Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, (2nd Edition, pp. 715-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jordan, A., Glenn, C., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2010). The Supporting Effective Teaching (SET) project: The relationship of inclusive teaching practices to teachers' beliefs about disability and ability, and about their roles as teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 26(2), 259-266.

Linhardt, G. (1995). Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction, Volume 5, Issue 4.

Mansour, N. (2008). Science Teachers Beliefs and Practies: Issues, Implications and Research Agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.

Mason, L. (2003). Personal epistemologies and intentional conceptual change. In G.M.Sinatra &P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 199–236).

Mason, L., & Bromme R. (2010). Situating and relating epistemological beliefs into metacognition: studies on beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Metacognition and Learning, 5(1):1-6.

Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational studies in mathematics, 38, 135-161.

McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press, Science and Educa-tion, An open Access and Academic Publisher.

Murdaca, A. M., Curatola, A., & Oliva, P., (2014). La dimensione metodologica: capacitazione, self de-termination theory e formazione degli adolescenti. Uno studio cross cultural. In L. Binanti (a cura di), La ca-pacitazione in prospettiva pedagogica (195-228). Pensa Multimedia Editore, Brescia – ISBN: 978-88-6760-202-5

Murdaca, A. M., Oliva P., & Panarello P. (2016). L’insegnante inclusivo: fattori individuali, percezione della disabilità e strategie didattiche. Formazione e Insegnamento, European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching.

Nespor, J. (1987). Il ruolo delle credenze nella pratica dell’insegnamento. Giornale di studi curriculari, vol 19, p.317-328.

Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension process. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp.210-224.

Palmieri, C. (2011). Un’esperienza di cui aver cura. Appunti pedagogici sul fare educazione. Milano. Franco Angeli. Metis, Mondi educativi. Temi indagini e suggestioni, Numero 1. 2015.

Paulsen, M.B., & Feldman P. (2005). The conditional and Interaction Effects of Epistemological Beliefs on the Self-Regulated Learning of College Students: Motivational Stategies, Research in Higher Education, 46(7): pp.731-768.

Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct, Review of Educational Research.

Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of Metacognitive Knoweledge in Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Theory in to practice, pp.219-226. Scientific Reasearch An Academic Publisher, Vol 8 No. 1, 2017.

Perry, W. (1970). Theory of intellectual and ethical development. Education, New Directions for student services.

Petter, G. (2011). Il mestiere di insegnante. Aspetti psicologici di una delle professioni più interessanti e impegnative. Manuali e monografie di psicologia, Giunti.

Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In Interna-tional handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223-1296). Springer, Dordrecht.

Schommer - Aikins, M., & Duell, O. K. (1997), Measures of Peoples Beliefs about Knowledge and Learn-ing. Educational Psychology Review, Volume 13. No.4. 2001.

Schraw, G. (2013). Conceptual Integration and Measurement of Epistemological and Ontological Beliefs in Educational Research. ISRN Education, 1-19. doi:10.1155/2013/327680

Strauss, S. (1993). Theories of learning and development for academics and educators. Educational Psy-chologist, 28(3), 191-203.

Van Manen, M. (1990), Researching Lived Experience. Human Science for Action Sensitive Pedagogy, second Edition, Routledge Taylor e Francis Group.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v6i1.559

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.


Copyright (c) 2022 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.