Paolo Fusco, Emanuela Zappalà, Amelia Lecce, Vincenza Barra, Michele Domenico Todino


Starting from the first lockdown, in April 2020, many Italian universities have created the conditions for taking lessons in the hours and days already scheduled through just one video conferencing software to connect students and professors. Indeed, many universities have worked assiduously to face the challenge of forced video-digitization imposed by the pandemic in a short time and with practical solutions, finally, they were being able to fully use the video-conferencing platforms that in many cases they already had, but they were used only in in sporadic cases. This work tries to bring out the experience happened at the University of Salerno regarding this issue and in particular about the sense of presence in remote synchronous teaching that it could be bringing out concerning three factors: objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity necessary in the teaching-learning process that transits on a multimedia channel, streaming video in real-time, which must take into account.

Parole chiave

didattica a distanza, sensorialità, didattica universitaria, e-learning, Learning Management System, Bisogni Educativi Speciali.

Full Text


Riferimenti bibliografici

Ainscow, M. (2004). El desarrollo de sistemas educativos inclusivos: ¿Cuáles son las palancas de cambio?. Journal of Educational Change, 5(4), pp. 1–20.

Altomari, N., Montesano, L., Straniero, A.M. (2020). La didattica a distanza all’Università in periodo di emergenza Covid-19: un’analisi su barriere e facilitatori incontrati dagli studenti con disabilità e DSA. Nuova Secondaria, 22, XXXVIII, pp. 489-510, ISSN 1828-4582

Arenghi, A., Bencini, G., Pavone, M., & Savarese, G. (2020). DaD in Università durante il lockdown: criticità e potenzialità Il punto di vista degli studenti con disabilità e con DSA. L’integrazione scolastica e sociale, 19 (3), pp. 48-67. doi: 10.14605/ISS1932005 — ISSN: 2724-2242.

Borghi, A. M., Gianelli, C., & Lugli, L. (2011). La dimensione sociale delle affordance: Affordance tra io e gli altri. Sistemi intelligenti, 23(2), pp. 291-300.

Chiappetta Cajola, L. (2020). E-learning inclusivo e studenti con DSA a Roma Tre: dati di ricerca e prospettive di sviluppo. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), (21), pp. 301-324.

Damasio, A. R. (2002). Emotion and the Human Brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935(1), pp. 101–106.

Davidesco, I., Kaggen L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Brain to brain synchrony tracks real word dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current biology, 27(9), 1375-1380.

Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin

Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y.P. (2013). Digital inequality. In W.H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 129–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, T. W., & Pedersen, S. B. (2016). Affect and affordances–The role of action and emotion in social interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 9(1), pp. 79-103.

Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), pp. 1019-1024.

Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

Liu, J., Zhang, R., Geng, B., Zhang, T., Yuan, D., Otani, S., & Li, X. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, pp, 93-102.

Manfredi. G. (2020). Audizione alla Commissione Cultura e Istruzione della Camera del il 9 aprile 2020.

Nicovich S.G., Boller G. W., Cornwell T. B. (2005). Experienced presence within computer-mediated communication: initial esploration on the effects of gender to empathy and immersion. Journal Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, p. 1-17.

Park, T., & Lim, C. (2019). Design principles for improving emotional affordances in an online learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), pp. 53-67

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), pp. 91–105.

Riva, G., & Waterworth, J. (2003). Presence and the self: a cognitive neuroscience approach. Presence Connect, 3(2003), pp. 1–14.

Riva, G.; Vatalaro, F., Zaffiro, G. (2009). Tecnologie della presenza. Concetti e applicazioni. Mondo Digitale, 3, pp. 32–45.

Riva, G. (2008). Presence and Social Presence: From Agency to Self and Others. Sophia, October, pp. 16–18.

Riva, G. (2020). Relazioni didattiche a distanza e in presenza. (ultima consultazione: 13/09/2021).

Rivoltella, P. C. (2018). The third age of the media. Research on Education and Media, 10(1), pp. 1–2.

Sacau A., Laarni J., Hartmann T. (2008). Influence of individual factor on presence. Computers in Human Behaviours, 24, p. 2255-2273.

Sandri, P., Ghiddi, M. (2020). Didattica a distanza e disabilità: una riflessione sulla collaborazione tra scuola e famiglia. Nuova Secondaria, 22, XXXVIII, pp. 260-280. ISSN 1828-4582

Schloerb. D. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Tteleoperators, and Virtual Environments, 4, pp. 64-80.

Shalom, J.G., Israeli, H., Markovitzky, O., Lipsitz, J.D., 2015. Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 44, pp. 202–208.

Sibilio, M. (2013). La didattica semplessa. Napoli: Liguori.

Sibilio M. (2020). L’interazione didattica. Brescia: Scholé.

Singh, R., & Awasthi, S. (2020). Updated Comparative Analysis on Video Conferencing Platforms-Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, WebEx Teams and GoToMeetings. EasyChair: The World for Scientists, 1-9.

Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale [SIREM] (2020). Compendio SIREM. La Didattica ai tempi del Coronavirus.

Tichavsky, L.P., Hunt, A.N., Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., 2015. “It's just nice having a real teacher”: student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn, 9, 2. Doi:

Universiteit van Amsterdam [UVA] (2017). New 'GPS' neuron discovered. ScienceDaily.

Vallverdú , J. (2015). Qualia learning? Innerbodiment construction and machine self-learning by (emotional) imitation. In J. Vallverdú (Ed.), Synthesizing human emotion in intelligent systems and robotics (pp. 193-205). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Vallverdú, J., & Trovato, G. (2016). Emotional affordances for human–robot interaction. Adaptive Behavior, 24(5), 320-334.

Vinci, V. (2020). Didattica digitale in Università: luci, ombre, prospettive. Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva, 4(4).

Riferimenti normativi

Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri (4 marzo 2020). Ulteriori disposizioni attuative del decreto-legge 23 febbraio 2020, n. 6, recante misure urgenti in materia di contenimento e gestione dell'emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19, applicabili sull'intero territorio nazionale. Disponibile su:

Decreto-legge n. 34 (19 maggio 2020), Misure urgenti in materia di salute, sostegno al lavoro e all'economia, nonché di politiche sociali connesse all'emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19. Disponibile su:

Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione [MIUR] (2020). Scuola, pubblicate le Linee guida per la Didattica digitale integrata.



  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.

Copyright (c) 2021 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.