STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS: CLUSTERS BASED ON METACOGNITION, LITERACY AND NUMERACY SKILLS

Annamaria De Santis, Katia Sannicandro, Claudia Bellini, Alessia Cadamuro, Tommaso Minerva

Abstract


Which models and frameworks can guide research investigating the link between metacognition, literacy, numeracy, and academic success?

The study we present here is based on research involving 107 students enrolled in the Digital Education degree course at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

We put in relation the results of three questionnaires on metacognition awareness (MAI), literacy, and numeracy to the students' university achievement and profiles.

Using cluster analysis, we identified groups of students with similar results in the three questionnaires. After, we verified if different values on academic performances characterized the clusters.

The Euclidean distance best fits our data, the method chosen to aggregate the groups is the Complete-linkage. A six-clusters solution was proposed.

Positive test results affect the quality and not the quantity of the exams passed. Students with higher exam grades belong to the groups in which numeracy test results are higher. The percentages of university credits acquired seemed higher when there was less uniformity in the students' entry test results.


Parole chiave


Education

Full Text

PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici


Adhitya, D., Mulyaningsih, T., & Samudro, B. R. (2019). The Role of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills on Labour Market Outcomes in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 53(1), 3-16.

Agenzia nazionale per le politiche attive del lavoro (ANPAL) (2020). OCSE PIAAC. Formazione e competenze online. Sperimentazione dello strumento di self-assessment nei Centri Provinciali per l’Istruzione degli Adulti. Retrieved from https://cpia-cl-en.edu.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/OCSE-PIAAC-Formazione-e-competenze-online-Sperimentazione-dello-strumento-di-self-assessment-nei-CPIA.pdf

Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 5645-5672. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0

Bartholomew, D.J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J.I. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton (FL): CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Osborne, M. (2001). Incentive-enhancing preferences: Personality, behavior, and earnings. American economic review, 91(2), 155-158.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe, (Eds.) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

De Santis, A., Sannicandro, K., Bellini, C., Cadamuro, A., Minerva, T. (in press). Metacognizione, literacy e numeracy come fattori predittivi del successo universitario degli studenti: analisi preliminare. Proceedings of “Research on educational neuroscience. School, sports & society, 1st international virtual conference – Rome, 30-31 marzo 2021.

De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R.H., Hannula, M.M., Schneider, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 97-105.

Durda, T., Gauly, B., Buddeberg, K., Lechner, C. M., & Artelt, C. (2020). On the comparability of adults with low literacy across LEO, PIAAC, and NEPS. Methodological considerations and empirical evidence. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1-34.

Fiore, S., & Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. (2010). Making Metacognition Explicit: Developing a Theoretical Foundation for Metacognitive Prompting During Scenario-based Training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 2233-2237.

Flavell J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1– 23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex (GB): Pearson.

Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor economics, 24(3), 411-482.

Istituto per lo sviluppo della formazione professionale dei lavoratori (ISFOL). PIAAC Online. Retrieved from https://www.isfol.it/piaac/piaac-online

Istituto per lo sviluppo della formazione professionale dei lavoratori (ISFOL) (2014). PIAAC-OCSE Rapporto nazionale sulle Competenze degli Adulti. Retrieved from https://www.isfol.it/piaac/Rapporto_Nazionale_Piaac_2014.pdf

Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading. Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4

Kàllay, E. (2012). Learning strategies and metacognitive awareness as predictors of academic achievement in a sample of Romanian second-year students. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 369-385.

Kim, C., Park, S. W., Cozart, J., & Lee, H. (2015). From motivation to engagement: The role of effort regulation of virtual high school students in mathematics courses. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 261–272.

Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24-33. 195.

Ohtani, K., Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: a meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition Learning, 13, 179-212 doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016), Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). PIAAC – Formazione & Competenze Online. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/skills/ESonline-assessment/abouteducationskillsonline/EducationSkillsOnline%20Info_italian_version%20(3).pdf

Reder, S., Gauly, B., & Lechner, C. (2020). Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency. International Review of Education, 66(2), 267-288.

Roebers, C. M., Krebs, S. S., & Roderer, T. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring and control in elementary school children: Their interrelations and their role for test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 141-149. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.003

Romainville, M. (1994) Awareness of cognitive strategies: The relationship between university students' metacognition and their performance. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 359-366, doi:10.1080/03075079412331381930

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117-139.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v5i2.378

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.


Copyright (c) 2021 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.