BODY AND TIME IN DISTANCE LEARNING. OXYMOR OR EDUCATIONAL CHANCE?

Sergio Bellantonio

Abstract


No doubt the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has changed the way we live and inhabit the world. From the reduction of our living spaces – which have been almost essentially confined within our homes – to the reduction of daily commuting, up to the transformation of our relationship with health, coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) is still continuing to change our lifestyles, probably improving some aspects. Thus, 2020 also gave a big boost to distance learning. The health emergency, in fact, has prompted the use of distance learning solutions which – although had been already deepened in pedagogy and didactics by Media Education – until today were considered marginal, both in working and school/university training contexts. At the center of the contemporary debate on distance learning there is certainly the relationship among body, space and time, which urges us to reflect on some questions. Is presence a value and distance a disvalue? Does presence learning guarantee the educational relationship and does distance learning impoverish it? What is the perspective to follow? The common sense would seem to lean towards a golden mean, further nourishing those dichotomies between body/mind, space/time, presence/distance. The aim of this paper is to reflect on these aspects, supporting a perspective that consider distance learning an educational chance which, however, needs to be designed in a more competent way.


Keywords


Distance Learning, COVID-19, Media Education, Learning, Teaching

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

References


Argyle, M. (1992). The Social Psychology of Everyday Life. Routledge: London. (trad. it., Psicologia sociale della vita quotidiana, Zanichelli, Torino, 1996).

Barbagli, M., Dei, D. (1969). Le Vestali della classe media. Ricerca sociologica sugli insegnanti. Il Mulino: Bologna.

Baudrillard, L. (1992). L’Illusion de la fin ou la grève des événements. Éditions Galilée: Paris. (trad. it., L’illusione della fine o lo sciopero degli eventi, Anabasi, Milano,1983).

Berthoz, A. (2009). La simplexité. Odile Jacob: Paris. (trad. it., La semplessità, Codice Edizioni, Torino, 2011).

Boyer, R. (1986). La théorie de la régulation: une analyse critique. La Découverte: Paris. (trad. it., Fordismo e postfordismo: il pensiero regolazionista, Egea Università Bocconi, Milano, 2007).

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press: London. (trad. it., La ricerca del significato. Per una psicologia culturale, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1992)

Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press: Cambridge. (trad. it., La cultura dell’educazione. Nuovi orizzonti per la scuola, Feltrinelli, Milano, 2001).

Cunti, A., Priore, A. (2014). Riflessività a scuola. Tra resistenze al cambiamento e aperture formative. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 82-100. DOI: 10.3280/ERP2014-001005.

Dei, M. (2019). A cinquant’anni dalla pubblicazione della ricerca sul mondo della scuola “Le Vestali della classe media”. Un breve saggio di Marcello Dei. https://www.girodivite.it/La-scuola-italiana-vista-dal.html (accessed, 12/12/2020).

Eugeni, R. (2015). La condizione postmediale. Media, linguaggi e narrazioni. Editrice la Scuola: Brescia.

Fabbri, L., Striano, M., Melacarne, C. (2008). L’insegnante riflessivo. Coltivazione e trasformazione delle pratiche professionali. FrancoAngeli: Milano.

Floridi, L. (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Floridi, L. (2015). The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer: London.

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9

Galimberti, U. (1999). Psiche e téchne. L’uomo nell’età della tecnica. Feltrinelli: Milano.

Galimberti, U. (2020). Heidegger e il nuovo inizio. Il pensiero al tramonto dell’occidente. Feltrinelli: Milano.

Gardner, H. (1989). To Open Minds: Chinese Clues to the Dilemma of Contemporary Education. Basic Books: New York. (trad. it., Aprire le menti. La creatività e i dilemmi dell’educazione, Feltrinelli, Milano, 1991)

Gardner, H. (1991). The Unschooled Mind. How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. Baror International: Armonk. (trad. it., Sapere per comprendere, Feltrinelli, Milano, 1999).

Gehlen, A. (1956). Urmensch und Spatkultur: philosophische Ergebnisse und Aussagen. Athenaum-Verlag: Bonn. (trad. it., L’uomo nell’era della tecnica: problemi socio-psicologici della civiltà industriale, Sugar, Milano, 1967).

Hall, E.T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday: New York. (trad. it., La dimensione nascosta, Bompiani, Milano, 1969).

Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of the Late Capitalism. Duke University Press: Durham. (trad. it., Il postmoderno o la logica culturale del tardo capitalismo, Garzanti, Milano, 1989).

Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht. (trad. it., Autopoiesi e cognizione. La realizzazione del vivente, Marsilio, Venezia, 1985).

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey Bass: San Francisco. (trad. it., Apprendimento e trasformazione. Il significato dell’esperienza e il valore della riflessione nell’apprendimento degli adulti, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2003).

Resnick, L., Spillane, J., Goldman, P., & Rangel, E. (2010). Implementing Innovation: From Visionary Models to Everyday Practice. In Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds) (2010). Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, OECD, Paris.

Rivoltella, P.C. (2020). Nuovi alfabeti. Educazione e culture nella società post-mediale. Scholé-Morcelliana: Brescia.

Rivoltella, P.C., Rossi, P.G. (2019). Tecnologie e didattica nella società informazionale. Una cornice concettuale. Milano: Unicatt.

Rossi, P.G. (2019). La didattica al tempo del digitale. In Rivoltella P.C., Rossi, P.G. (a cura di) (2019). Tecnologie per l’educazione. Pearson: Milano.

Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books: New York (trad. it., Il professionista riflessivo. Per una nuova epistemologia della pratica professionale, Dedalo, Bari, 1999).

Sibilio, M. (2020). L’interazione didattica. La Scuola: Brescia.

Sibilio, M., & Zollo, I. (2016). The non-linear potential of didactic action. Educational Scien- ces & Society, 2, 51-70.

Vattimo, G., Rovatti, P.A. (a cura di) (2010). Il pensiero debole. Feltrinelli: Milano.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v4i4_si.292

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN: 2532-3296